🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts noted the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a third party collected public metadata and used illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be utilized for training AI models.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the AI industry, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own private free equivalent of the service”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.